Less time assembling answers.
More room for judgment.
Proofline brings research agents, source evidence and human review into one process. Built for the work where a confident answer is only useful if you can check how it was reached.
Why we are building itBring the records together. Keep the reasoning visible.
Research is scattered across company records, documents, policies and news. Proofline helps turn that context into work another person can inspect.
- Start with the question.Define the task, the sources and what a useful result should contain.
- Keep the evidence close.Review findings beside their supporting records and open checks.
- Leave room for judgment.Use a clear draft to support the next decision your team makes.
For repeat work
Start with a reusable agent or playbook for company research, supplier diligence, account preparation or market research.
For the reviewer
Keep cited evidence and open questions beside the result so the next person can inspect the work.
For your process
Use the workspace, API or MCP interface to fit research into the tools and review steps you already use.
Five principles. One useful answer.
These principles guide how the product is built and how its results should be used.
Show the source
A claim without a citation is a guess. Research should make its evidence inspectable, so people can check the result for themselves.
- Open the supporting record.
- Keep the quoted passage with the finding.
- Make conflicting evidence visible.
The details are the product.
A research product earns its place through clear behavior, inspectable outputs and measured changes. Corrections should improve the method, not disappear into another conversation.
- 01
Write it down
Each change starts with a short written plan and a clear reason.
- 02
Measure the change
Agents have eval cases; a new version must pass them before it is published.
- 03
Keep corrections
A reviewer’s correction can become a test case for the next version.
- 04
Publish the details
Costs, limits and what the product cannot do yet are written on this site.
Know the controls.
Understand the limits.
Review access, data handling, retention and the product’s current certification status before choosing the context you bring into a workspace.
Explore the Trust Center ↗Define the work. Agree what good looks like.
A practical pilot starts with a real task and a way to review the result. Scope the sources, the output, and the acceptance criteria together.
Use this sample checklist to think through your first workflow. Your selections stay on this page.
Discuss a company pilot ↗Ask your hardest question.
Your first 10 Standard tasks every month are on us.